banner



Home  ›  Animal Testing – Science Or Tradition? What Future For Alternatives To Animal Testing?

Animal Testing – Science Or Tradition? What Future For Alternatives To Animal Testing?

Written By Monday, July 4, 2022 Add Comment Edit

Test methods that avert the utilise of animals

Alternatives to creature testing are the development and implementation of exam methods that avoid the use of live animals.

At that place is widespread understanding that a reduction in the number of animals used and the refinement of testing to reduce suffering should be important goals for the industries involved.[1] Two major alternatives to in vivo beast testing are in vitro cell civilisation techniques and in silico calculator simulation. However, some claim they are not true alternatives because simulations use data from prior beast experiments and prison cell cultures often require animal derived products, such as serum or cells. Others say that they cannot supersede animals completely equally they are unlikely to ever provide plenty information most the circuitous interactions of living systems.[2] Other alternatives include the utilise of humans for peel irritancy tests and donated man claret for pyrogenicity studies. Another alternative is so-called microdosing, in which the basic behaviour of drugs is assessed using human being volunteers receiving doses well below those expected to produce whole-torso effects.[iii] While microdosing produces important information about pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics it does not reveal information about toxicity or toxicology.[four] Furthermore, it was noted past the Fund for the Replacement of Animals in Medical Experiments that despite the use of microdosing, "fauna studies volition however be required".[5]

Guiding principles for more upstanding use of animals in testing are the Three Rs (3Rs) first described past Russell and Burch in 1959.[6] These principles are now followed in many testing establishments worldwide.

  1. Replacement refers to the preferred use of non-brute methods over creature methods whenever it is possible to reach the same scientific aim.
  2. Reduction refers to methods that enable researchers to obtain comparable levels of information from fewer animals, or to obtain more information from the same number of animals.
  3. Refinement refers to methods that alleviate or minimize potential pain, suffering, or distress, and enhance animal welfare for the animals used.

Cell civilisation and tissue engineering [edit]

Jail cell culture can be an culling to animal use in some cases. For example, cultured cells have been developed to create monoclonal antibodies; prior to this, product required animals to undergo a process likely to crusade pain and distress.[7] However, fifty-fifty though cell or tissue culture methods may reduce the number of experiments performed on intact animals, the maintenance of cells in culture unremarkably requires the use of fauna-derived serum. Although exact figures are difficult to obtain, some have estimated that i meg foetal cows are sacrificed each year to obtain the earth's supply of foetal bovine serum, used to grow cultured cells.[8] The testing of cosmetic products directly onto an animate being can exist minimized or eliminated past the use of in vitro jail cell growth and development. This can be generalized equally the growth of cells outside of the body and tested on without causing damage or pain on the test subject. Much of the time this method of cosmetic testing is less time-consuming and less expensive than alternative choices.[9]

Skin corrosion and pare irritation [edit]

Skin irritation and skin corrosion refer to localized toxic furnishings resulting from a topical exposure of the skin to a substance. Human skin equivalent tests can be used to replace animal-based corrosive and irritative studies. EpiDerm from Mattek[10] and EpiSkin[eleven] and SkinEthic RHE model[12] are derived from human skin cells which have been cultured to produce a model of human skin. These methods are currently accustomed replacements in Canada and the European Union (EU).[thirteen] In August 2010, the Arrangement for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) published the Test Guideline 439 which describes the new procedure for in vitro hazard identification of irritant chemicals.[14]

Another synthetic replacement uses a protein membrane to simulate a pare bulwark and is approved as a partial replacement past the United states of america Department of Transportation and Eu.[15]

Skin absorption [edit]

Several tissue civilisation methods that measure out the rate of chemical absorption past the skin have been approved by the OECD.[16]

Phototoxicity [edit]

Phototoxicity is a rash, swelling, or inflammation, similar a severe sunburn, caused past exposure to light following exposure to a chemical. The 3T3 Neutral Red Uptake (NRU) Phototoxicity Examination, approved by the OECD, detects the viability of 3T3 cells after exposure to a chemical in the presence or absence of light.[17] The 3T3 cell line was adult in 1962 and is derived from mouse embryonic fibroblast cells.[xviii]

Fungal model for mammalian drug metabolism [edit]

Fungi like Cunninghamella elegans can be used every bit a microbial model of mammalian drug metabolism[nineteen] [20] [21] [22] thereby reducing the need for laboratory animals.[23]

Prokaryotes are often used as an alternative to animal testing. Prokaryotes include bacteria such as Escherichia coli (E. coli) or Bacillus subtilis. These bacteria are the platonic model for genetic and molecular studies. Fungi is too used as an alternative for animate being testing. Certain fungi tin be used for genetic studies or circadian rhythms studies. This may include Neurospora crassa, otherwise known as a type of blood-red mould. Invertebrates are another platonic candidate for testing. One of the nearly common invertebrates tested on include Drosophila melanogaster, the fruit fly. Fruit flies are used to find man diseases. Fruit flies and humans are more alike in their composition that one would retrieve and this is proven within these studies.

Organoids (3D cell cultures) [edit]

Russell and Burch writing six decades ago could not have anticipated some of the technologies that have emerged today. One of these technologies, 3D cell cultures, also known as organoids or mini-organs, have replaced beast models for some types of research. In contempo years, scientists have produced organoids that tin can be used to model disease and test new drugs. Organoids grow in vitro on scaffolds (biological or synthetic hydrogels such as Matrigel) or in a culture medium. Organoids are derived from three kinds of homo or animal stalk cells—embryonic pluripotent stalk cells (ESCs), developed somatic stem cells (ASCs), and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). These organoids are grown in vitro and mimic the structure and function of different organs such as the encephalon, liver, lung, kidney, and intestine. Organoids have been developed to study infectious affliction. Scientists at Johns Hopkins University have developed mini-brain organoids to model how COVID-19 can bear on the brain.[24] Researchers have used brain organoids to model how the Zika virus disrupts foetal brain evolution. Tumoroids—3D cell cultures derived from cells biopsied from human patients—can be used in studying the genomics and drug resistance of tumours in different organs. Organoids are also used in modelling genetic diseases such equally cystic fibrosis, neurodegenerative diseases such equally Alzheimer's and Parkinson's, infectious diseases such equally MERS-CoV and norovirus, and parasitic infections such as Toxoplasma gondii. Human- and fauna-cell-derived organoids are also used extensively in pharmacological and toxicological research.

Human being-based [edit]

Skin irritation [edit]

A skinpatch test has been designed and is used in Canada to measure evolution of rashes, inflammation, swelling or aberrant tissue growth on human volunteers.[25] Unlike corrosives, substances defined as irritants cause only reversible skin damage.

Another approach has been the development of test methods that utilise cultured human cells. Human epidermal keratinocytes have been cultured to mimic the man epidermis, and are used to mensurate pare irritation and dermal corrosion. This method has been accustomed by the European union and is intended to supervene upon the Draize rabbit skin irritation exam.[26]

Pyrogenicity [edit]

Pyrogens are most often pharmaceutical products or intravenous drugs that may cause inflammation or fever when they collaborate with allowed organization cells. This interaction can be quickly and accurately tested in vitro.

Modular immune in vitro construct [edit]

The modular immune in vitro construct (MIMIC) uses homo cells to create a model of the human immune organization on which the efficacy of new vaccines and other compounds may be tested, replacing some steps of the vaccine development process that would otherwise be performed on animals. This process is faster and more flexible than previous methods but critics worry that it may be also unproblematic to exist useful on a large scale.[27]

Medical imaging [edit]

Medical imaging is able to demonstrate to researchers both how drugs are metabolised past apply of microdosing, and the detailed condition of organ tissue.[28]

Computer simulation [edit]

Crash test dummies have been used to supersede live animals in impact testing.

Examples of computer simulations bachelor include models of asthma,[29] though potential new medicines identified using these techniques are currently yet required to exist verified in brute and human tests earlier licensing.

Computer operated mannequins, also known as crash test dummies, complete with internal sensors and video, have replaced live brute trauma testing for automobile crash testing. The first of these was "Sierra Sam" built in 1949 by Alderson Research Labs (ARL) Sierra Applied science. These dummies go along to exist refined.[30] Prior to this, live pigs were used as test subjects for crash testing.[31]

Computer models take been constructed to model human being metabolism, to study plaque build-up and cardiovascular risk, and to evaluate toxicity of drugs, tasks for which animals are also used.[32] In 2007, US researchers using the globe's fastest figurer at the time, BlueGene L, modelled half a mouse encephalon for just 10 seconds. Notwithstanding, due to limitations in calculating power, the simulation could only be run at one-tenth the speed of an actual mouse brain.[33] Although this was an advance in science, its representative ability as a model was limited and the researchers were quoted as saying that "although the simulation shared some similarities with a mouse's mental make-up in terms of nerves and connections information technology lacked the structures seen in existent mice brains."[33]

For pharmacology and toxicology, physiologically based pharmacokinetic models are much used for in vitro to in vivo extrapolation of alternative testing.

Microfluidic fries [edit]

Microfluidic fries, which are simply two cm wide, can be engraved into a serial of small chambers, each containing a sample of tissue from a different office of the body. A substitute of claret flows through micro-channels where the compartments of chips linked. When injected, the test drug circulates effectually the device, mimicking what goes in the trunk on a micro calibration. Sensors in the chip transfer information for reckoner analysis.[34]

Some other name for this chip is the microfluidic chip is prison cell-bio chips. With the capacity to "perform perfusion culture" and reproduce "physiological conditions such three-dimensional architectures, circulatory flowrate and zonation and multi cellular co-cultures", the biochips have ready themselves apart from bones jail cell cultures analysed in a Petri dish.[35] The effectiveness of these systems is constantly beingness increased with various new materials that can be used to make information technology. An platonic cloth would be gas permeable but even so be able to absorb molecules that would be expected to be institute in diverse drugs [35]

The choice of the fabric for chips is still challenging. One of the major materials that tin exist possibly used in chips is known as polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS). However, due to lack of facilities for mass production and drug clearance result, the use of PDMS is still being speculated, even though information technology has groovy properties as microfluidic bit. Also, the biological process involved in proliferation and metabolism might exist modified when compared to larger scales, because the materials have micro-structured scales comparable in size to cells.[36]

Hereafter alternatives [edit]

Organs on a scrap [edit]

The Wyss Constitute for Biologically Inspired Applied science (U.s.) intends to develop in-vitro organs for drug screening and thereby eliminate the utilise of animals for this type of testing. Ane model is the "lung-on-a-chip".[37] This combines microfabrication techniques with mod tissue engineering and mimics the complicated mechanical and biochemical behaviours of a human lung.

Man toxome [edit]

Toxicity testing typically involves studying adverse health outcomes in animals subjected to high doses of toxicants with subsequent extrapolation to expected man responses at lower doses. The system relies on the apply of a 40+yr-former patchwork of creature tests that are expensive (costing more than $3B per year), fourth dimension-consuming, low-throughput and often provide results of limited predictive value for human being health effects. The low-throughput of current toxicity testing approaches (which are largely the same for industrial chemicals, pesticides and drugs) has led to a excess of more than than fourscore,000 chemicals to which humans are potentially exposed whose potential toxicity remains largely unknown. In 2007, the National Enquiry Council (NRC) released the report "Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A Vision and a Strategy",[38] that charted a long-range strategic plan for transforming toxicity testing. The major components of the plan include the use of predictive, high-throughput cell-based assays (of man origin) to evaluate perturbations in central toxicity pathways, and to conduct targeted testing confronting those pathways. This arroyo will greatly accelerate our ability to test the vast "storehouses" of chemic compounds using a rational, risk-based approach to chemical prioritization, and provide test results that are hopefully far more predictive of human toxicity than current methods. Although a number of toxicity pathways accept already been identified, virtually are only partially known and no common note exists. Mapping the entirety of these pathways (i.e. the Human Toxome[39] ) will exist a large-calibration effort, peradventure on the social club of the Human Genome Project.

Inquiry initiatives [edit]

SEURAT-1 [edit]

SEURAT-one is a long-term strategic target for "Safety Evaluation Ultimately Replacing Animate being Testing".[twoscore] It is called "SEURAT-i" to signal that more steps have to exist taken before the last goal volition be reached. SEURAT-1 will develop noesis and engineering science building blocks required for the development of solutions for the replacement of current repeated dose systemic toxicity testing in vivo used for the assessment of human safety. SEURAT-i is composed of six research projects, which started on January 1, 2011 and volition run for five years. These projects volition closely cooperate with a mutual goal and combine the research efforts of over 70 European universities, public inquiry institutes and companies. The collaboration betwixt these six research projects, the dissemination of results, the cooperation with other international research teams, and the continuous updating on research priorities will be facilitated by the coordination and support action project "COACH".

SEURAT-1 was developed through the Framework Programme 7 (FP7) research initiative and was created through a call for proposals past the European Commission (EC) that was published in June 2009. The Cosmetics Europe industry offered to match the EC's funds to make a total of EUR 50 1000000 available to try to fill electric current gaps in scientific noesis and advance the evolution of non-creature test methods.

Euroecotox [edit]

Laboratory animals are not restricted to rats, mice, dogs, and rabbits, merely besides include fish, frogs and birds. Research into alternatives to replace these species is often neglected, although fish are the third most widely used laboratory beast used for scientific purposes in the EU.[41] This is also the field where until now only two culling tests exist worldwide: One guideline, OECD TG 236,[42] and ane guidance (OECD series on testing and assessment 126)[43] are so far bachelor.

Euroecotox[44] is a European network for alternative testing strategies in ecotoxicology. It was funded past the Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) of the European Commission Surroundings Programme. The main objectives of the Euroecotox network are: To contribute to the advancement of alternative methods of ecotoxicity testing in Europe. To promote the validation and regulatory acceptance of new culling ecotoxicity methods. To facilitate the networking of research groups working in the field of alternative ecotoxicology. To provide a gathering point for all stakeholders involved in the development, validation, regulatory acceptance and last apply of alternative ecotoxicity testing strategies. To human action as the 1 voice for culling ecotoxicity testing in Europe.

AXLR8 [edit]

AXLR8 is a coordination action funded by the European Commission Directorate General for Research & Innovation nether the 7 Framework Program vii (FP7) Wellness Theme. The European Commission is currently funding a number of research consortia to develop new 3Rs (replacement, reduction and refinement) test methods and strategies as potential alternatives to the use of animals in condom testing. Monitoring of these 3Rs activities at pan-European, national, and international levels is vital to facilitate swift progress. AXLR8 aims to fulfil this growing need by providing a focal bespeak for dialogue and collaboration.[45] Humane Social club International is part of the consortium.

Regulation [edit]

European Spousal relationship [edit]

EU Directive 2010/63/EU [edit]

On January one, 2013, EU Directive 2010/63/EU "on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes" entered into force for the European union member states (MS),[46] repealing Directive 86/609/EEC.[47] Considering it is a directive, it allows fellow member states sure flexibility in transposition of national rules. The status of the implementation of the new directive in the EU is described by the EC General Environment Advisers.[48]

Commodity 1.iii: The new Eu directive applies to the post-obit animals: (a) live non-human being vertebrate animals, including: (i) independently feeding larval forms; and (ii) foetal forms of mammals from the last tertiary of their normal development; (b) live cephalopods.
Article iv: The directive refers directly to the 3Rs:[six] "Principle of replacement, reduction and refinement".
Article 47-2: Member states shall assist the commission in identifying and nominating suitable specialised and qualified laboratories to carry out such validation studies.

In July 2013, the commission announced the creation of NETVAL [49] (Eu Network of Laboratories for the Validation of Alternative Methods). EU-NETVAL's primary role is to provide support for EURL ECVAM validation projects, including aspects of training and dissemination, and the identification of methods that have a potential to reduce, refine or replace animals used for scientific purposes.[50] Currently there are thirteen test facilities in nine fellow member states: Federal republic of germany (three), the Netherlands (two), Espana (ii), Belgium (1), Czech Commonwealth (1), Finland (1), France (1), Italy (i) and Sweden (1).[49]

Other regulations [edit]

The Cosmetics Directive provides the regulatory framework for the phasing out of animal testing for cosmetics purposes. It establishes prohibitions against (a) testing finished cosmetic products and corrective ingredients on animals (testing ban), and (b) marketing in the Eu finished cosmetic products and ingredients included in cosmetic products which were tested on animals for cosmetics purposes (marketing ban). The aforementioned provisions are independent in Cosmetics Regulation European union 1223/2009, which replaces the Cosmetics Directive as of July 11, 2013.[51]

In 2007, EU legislation on the Registration, Evaluation, Say-so and Restriction of Chemicals (Accomplish EC 1907/2006) came into force, relating to chemicals and their safety employ.[52] The aim of Attain is to improve the protection of human health and the environment through the improve and earlier identification of the intrinsic backdrop of chemical substances. It promotes the use of alternative methods for animal testing, but does not oblige the test performer to do and then; "Article 25.1 - In gild to avoid animate being testing, testing on vertebrate animals for the purposes of this Regulation shall exist undertaken only as a last resort. It is also necessary to take measures limiting duplication of other tests."

In parallel to the adoption of REACH, the EC published standardised and accepted methods for testing hazardous properties of chemicals. These were written into the "Test Methods Regulation".[53] All the alternative test methods amidst the in vivo studies are included in PART B; "The European Marriage is committed to promoting the development and validation of culling techniques which can provide the same level of information as current creature tests, but which utilize fewer animals, cause less suffering or avoid the use of animals completely. Such methods, as they become bachelor, must exist considered wherever possible for hazard characterisation and consequent classification and labeling for intrinsic hazards and chemic safety assessment."

Eu philosophy on food additives, food enzymes, and food flavourings and ingredients intended for homo consumption is that none should be put on the marketplace unless they are included on a published Community list of authorised substances, in accordance with the conditions laid down in relevant nutrient law. This approach is intended to bring food producers into compliance with the provisions of Regulation (EC) 1334/2008 that pertain to the safety of nutrient flavourings. As part of the approval process, the EC will require total disclosure of study data, safety issues, and toxicological findings for all such additives.[54]

Within the EU beast welfare law (2010/63/European union), the principles of the 3Rs are invoked whenever toxicological test methods are necessary.[55]

Organizations and programs [edit]

Scientific congresses [edit]

The European Society for Alternatives to Animal Testing (EUSAAT)[56] organises an annual conference in Linz (Austria) for

  1. Dissemination and validation of culling methods to creature testing
  2. Promotion of enquiry in the field of the 3Rs
  3. Reduction of the use of animals for tests in the field of education and continuing education
  4. Reduction of suffering and stress of laboratory animals by ameliorate breeding, keeping, test planning and other accompanying measures
  5. Experts' guidance and referees' stance for public and private organizations, companies, universities
  6. Suitable information for the public and the media

The World Congress on Alternatives and Fauna Use in the Life Sciences takes identify every 3 years. The next conference (10th) will be held in September 2017 in Seattle.[57]

The 1st Latino-Americano Congress on Alternative to Brute Testing took place in 2012. Colama (I Congresso Latino-Americano De Metodos Alternativos Ao Uso De Animais No Ensino, Pesquisa E Industria).[58]

The Johns Hopkins University Middle for Alternatives to Animate being Testing (CAAT) co-organizes an annual symposium on the 3Rs with the USDA's Animal Welfare Data Center (AWIC) and NIH'southward Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare.[59] Previously known equally the Social Housing Symposium, the symposium has occurred annually (except for 2015) since 2013 with past symposia archived on video on the AWIC website.[60] Videos of the most recent symposium, "seventh Annual 3Rs Symposium: Practical Solutions and Success Stories," held in June 2020, may also be found on the AWIC website.[61]

Manufacture and corporate initiatives [edit]

  • Cosmetics Europe: Represents the interests of more than 4000 companies in the cosmetic, toiletry and perfumery industry since 1962.[62]
  • Unilever: "We exercise not test finished products on animals unless demanded by the regulatory government in the few countries where this is the law. In such cases, we try to convince the local authorities to change the law. Where some testing of ingredients is required by law or currently unavoidable, we aim to minimise the number of animals used."[63]
  • BASF: "Systematic screening investigations provide data about of import toxicological properties of substances at an early stage of development. ... We supercede animal experiments whenever an alternative method is available that complies with an OECD Examination Guideline and is recognized by the authorities."[64]

Beast welfare and animal rights organizations [edit]

  • Eurogroup for Animals: "An estimated 12.ane million animals – including dogs, rabbits and even our closest genetic relatives, primates – are used in laboratory research throughout Europe every twelvemonth. Eurogroup focusses on ensuring their protection and works with legislators, experts and industry with the aim of ultimately replacing all brute experiments with viable alternatives. We continue to actively promote the replacement, reduction and refinement of beast tests and do all nosotros can to meliorate the lives of those animals currently used for research."[65]
  • Vier Pfoten (Four Paws) (Republic of austria)[66]
  • Antitoxin (French republic) "When it is near assessing drug condom, humans are not 70kg rats! It is near time to move on from the actual paradigm on assessing drug safe. The first pace would be to eliminate all the regulatory requirements for animal testing and replace these tests by 21st century methods."[67]
  • Deutscher Tierschutzbund (Federal republic of germany)[68]
  • Lega Anti Vivisezione (Italy)[69]
  • The ALEXANDRA Association (Monaco): "... aims at stimulating research and evolution (R&D) in the area of culling methods to brute experimentation past providing political, technical and educational support to researchers and entrepreneurs worldwide. In detail alternative methods based on 'Open Source' concepts i.due east. not-patent protected core technologies for human tissue reconstruction and prison cell culture technologies volition be actively promoted."[70]
  • British Spousal relationship for the Abolition of Vivisection (BUAV): "For over 100 years the BUAV has been campaigning peacefully to create a globe where nobody wants or believes we demand to experiment on animals."[71]
  • New England Anti-Vivisection Social club (NEAVS) (United states of america): "Recognition of the inadequacy of beast toxicity testing has resulted in the development of better techniques ... NEAVS and its programs will help hasten the inevitable and necessary transition away from animal-based experimentation, testing, and teaching, toward science and science education governed by progressive scientific thought and empathetic ethics."[72]
  • Humane Society International (HSI) in the Usa and UK: "Today, scientific and authorities authorities worldwide are acknowledging the deficiencies of "animal models" and calling for a new approach to safety testing and health enquiry using land-of-the-art techniques. Advances in biology, genetics, calculator scientific discipline and robotics have given scientists new tools to help identify the root causes of human toxicity and disease."[73]
  • People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) in the U.s.a. and UK: "We teamed up with CeeTox, Inc. to fund work on a new humane pare test that could supervene upon painful tests on mice and republic of guinea pigs."[74]

Public campaigns and awards [edit]

  • Petition to the European Parliament for the abolition of vivisection as a European Denizen Initiative.[75] The threshold of ane 1000000 signatures was reached for the deadline (ane Nov 2013). The European Commission is currently checking the authenticity of each signature.
  • "Get cruelty complimentary"[76] The launch of the global "Go Cruelty-Gratuitous" entrada occurred in 2012 and every year since the launch there have been more and more contributions from around the globe to help put a finish to using animals for lab testing. The nigh contempo contribution is from Australia in 2019, they banned the utilise of newly derived animal test data for cosmetics.[77]
  • HSI's report "Advancing Rubber Scientific discipline and Health Research with Innovative, Not-Beast Tools"[78]
  • The Lush Prize: "The Lush Prize is a major initiative which will use resource to bring forrard the day when safety testing takes place without the utilise of animals. The Lush Prize will focus pressure on toxicity testing for consumer products and ingredients in a fashion which complements the many projects already addressing the use of animals in medical testing."[79]
  • EPAA (European Partnership for Culling Approaches to Animal Testing) volition grant a €3000 prize to a laboratory technician involved in implementing and raising awareness of Replacement, Reduction and Refinement of creature testing.[80]
  • The Alternatives Inquiry and Development Foundation (ARDF) provides grants to accelerate the use of non-animal methods in the fields of biomedical testing, research, and education.[81]
  • The international NC3Rs 3Rs Prize is awarded to highlight an outstanding original contribution to scientific and technological advances in the 3Rs in medical, biological or veterinary sciences published inside the last three years.[82]
  • The American Fund for Alternatives to Animal Research (AFAAR) funds a wide and encompassing range of research involving the use, development, or validation of alternatives.[83]

Educational activity and training [edit]

  • IIVS: The Plant for In Vitro Sciences, Inc. is a non-turn a profit enquiry and testing laboratory dedicated to the advancement of in vitro (non-animal) methods worldwide. Founded in 1997, IIVS has worked with manufacture and government agencies to implement in vitro testing strategies that limit brute employ while supplying key information for product rubber and efficacy decisions.[84]
  • NORINA is a database containing details of products which may exist used as alternatives or supplements to the use of animals in education and grooming.[85] NORINA's search engine is linked to those of two other databases: TextBase, which provides information on textbooks and other written material of relevance to laboratory creature science and alternatives, and 3R Guide which gives details of guidelines, information centres, databases, journals and electronic mail lists inside the field of replacement, reduction and refinement of beast experimentation. The three databases are hosted by Norecopa.[86]
  • InterNICHE is the International Network for Humane Education. It has been developed to run into the needs of teachers and trainers, students, ethics committees, alternatives producers and campaigners internationally.[87]
  • "Tierschutz macht Schule" - the Clan for Animal Welfare Teaching - was founded in the grade of the implementation of Republic of austria's nationwide animate being welfare law. The creature welfare education association aims to improve the living weather condition of pets, farm animals, laboratory animals and wild animals through providing knowledge well-nigh their needs and behaviour to children, youth and the public.[88] The clan offers a teaching magazine nigh research animals and animal tests suitable for secondary schools and higher, which can be ordered on their website. It aims at explaining alternatives to creature testing in a youth appropriate language and can be used in lessons directly away.
  • XCellR8's mission is to back up, develop and implement the utilise of scientifically advanced and ethically sound alternatives to animal testing. They are an exclusively in vitro company, with commitment to promoting not-animal testing strategies at the core of all of their activities.[89]
  • The Fauna Welfare Information Center at the National Agricultural Library (USDA) holds a workshop several times a year called "Meeting the Information Requirements of the Animal Welfare Act." In the workshop, researchers and other stakeholders larn how to perform literature searches for animal apply alternatives likewise equally the history and development of the Creature Welfare Act of 1966 and its amendments, showing how the legislation regulates creature welfare.[xc]
  • EPISKIN Academy is an initiative of the industry to propose training and courses to facilitate the deployment of validated culling methods to creature testing in toxicology and to prepare next generations of scientists and toxicologists to use these methods. Created in 2012, EPISKIN Academy proposes a modular program ranging from sit-in of these methods to full theoretical and practical laboratory grooming leading to certification. Based on long-term partnerships with institutional partners in unlike countries, this programme in teaching allows hands-on training to the methods but also to the scientific and regulatory knowledge important for their implementation and acceptance.

Institutes and national or international organizations [edit]

Institutes and organizations that research or fund alternatives to brute testing include:

Asia - Oceania [edit]

  • Medical Advances Without Animals Trust (Commonwealth of australia)[91]
  • Alternatives to Fauna Experimentation Laboratory, Department of Pharmacology, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh (India).[92]
  • Mahatma Gandhi-Doerenkamp Heart for Alternatives to Apply of Animals in Life Scientific discipline, Bharathidasan university, Trichy, Tamil Nadu, India Teaching[93]
  • Japanese Center for the Validation of Alternative Methods (JACVAM), since 2005[94]
  • The Korean Eye for the Validation of Culling Methods (KOCVAM), since 2009[95]

Due south America [edit]

  • BraCVAM as the Brazilian Eye for the Validation of Alternatives Methods. It was established in 2011.[96] [97]

N America [edit]

  • Canadian Quango on Creature Care[98]
  • Canadian Middle for Alternatives to Brute Methods, founded in 2017 at the University of Windsor.
  • Health Canada, which does non have a formal validation centre, just coordinates health related test method validation and acceptance bug[99]
  • American Fund for Alternatives to Animal Enquiry (AFAAR): "Over the years, AFAAR has funded alternatives worldwide, including more than than 200 human tissue culture tests to supplant toxicity and other testing on animals ... Today, AFAAR funds a wide and encompassing range of research involving the use, development, or validation of alternatives."[83]
  • Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Culling Methods (ICCVAM) (United States), since 1994;[100]
  • Johns Hopkins University Heart for Alternatives to Animal Testing[101]
  • Physicians Commission for Responsible Medicine (U.s.a.)

Europe [edit]

  • The EC's interest in activities targeted to the validation of alternative approaches to fauna testing started in 1991, with the launch of ECVAM (European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods), hosted by the Joint Research Middle, Institute for Wellness and Consumer Protection (IHCP). As from 2011, ECVAM's tasks are assigned to EURL ECVAM.[102] Official bodies such equally the EURL ECVAM,[102] hosts an online database of toxicological, non-animal alternative test methods DB-ALM,.[103]
  • Under the Framework Programmes 6 and vii, the EC funded a pregnant number of large integrated research projects aiming to develop alternatives to animal testing for most EUR 330 1000000 based on the Review of REACH from Feb 2013 (the European Chemic Program).[104]
  • The European Partnership for Alternative Approaches to Animate being Testing (EPAA) as a liaison betwixt the EC and industries.[105]
  • The European Consensus Platform for Alternatives (ECOPA) coordinates efforts amongst EU fellow member states.[106]
  • Zentrum fuer Ersatz (Republic of austria)[107]
  • Finnish Center for Alternative Methods (FICAM), since 2008[108]
  • FRANCOPA is the French platform dedicated to evolution, validation, and broadcasting of alternative methods in animal testing. It was created on November xvi, 2007.[109]
  • Zentralstelle zur Erfassung und Bewertung von Ersatz- und Ergänzungsmethoden (ZEBET) (Germany), since 1989[110] [111]
  • Norecopa is the Norwegian consensus platform for the replacement, reduction and refinement of animal experiments. It was founded on Oct 10, 2007 [112]
  • Romanian Center for Alternative Examination Methods (ROCAM) promotes the application of alternative methods in industry and their acceptance by regulators in Romania and too the development of new methods and approaches. ROCAM was established in June 2015 with the main goal to support and promote the 3Rs principles in Romania and regionally.
  • Dr Hadwen Trust (United Kingdom)
  • Fund for the Replacement of Animals in Medical Experiments (U.k.)[113]
  • National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Inquiry (NC3Rs) (United Kingdom), since 2004[114]

International [edit]

  • International Cooperation on Alternative Test Methods (ICATM): On April 27, 2009 the United States, Canada, Japan and European union signed a memorandum of cooperation that could reduce the number of animals required for consumer product safety testing worldwide. The agreement will yield globally coordinated scientific recommendations on alternative toxicity testing methods that should speed their adoption in each of these countries, thus reducing the number of animals needed for product safe testing.[115]

International Cooperation on Alternative Test Methods (ICATM)
Fable :
ICH: The International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Apply[116]
OECD: The Organisation for Economic Co-functioning and Development has a Test Guideline program that deals with chemicals.[117]
ICCR: The International Cooperation on Cosmetics Regulation (ICCR) is an international group of cosmetic regulatory authorities from the United States (FDA), Japan (Ministry building of Wellness, Labour, and Welfare), the European union (EC, DG Enterprise), and Canada (Health Canada). This multilateral framework maintains the highest level of global consumer protection, while minimizing barriers to international trade.[118]

  • The OECD (Organisation for Economical Co-functioning and Development) is a forum for discussion where governments express their points of view, share their experiences, and search for mutual ground, equally opposed to a supranational organization.[119] OECD is a forum where culling test methods too undergo validation and are therereafter accepted for regulatory purposes in more than 35 member countries worldwide.[120] NGOs are represented at the technical level at the OECD, under the ICOPA International Council on Beast Protection in OECD plan.[121] The testing of chemicals is labor-intensive and expensive. Often the same chemical is tested in several countries simultaneously, which means that redundant creature tests are performed. To relieve some of this burden, the OECD Council adopted a decision in 1981, stating that data generated in a member state, in accordance with OECD Exam Guidelines and Principles of Good Laboratory Practice (GLP), shall be accepted in other member countries for assessment purposes and other uses relating to the protection of man health and the environment. This principle is referred to using the acronym MAD, for the Mutual Acceptance of Data.[119]

Run into too [edit]

  • Animate being products in pharmaceuticals
  • Canadian Centre for Alternatives to Animal Methods
  • Humane Research Trust
  • In vitro toxicology

References [edit]

  1. ^ R E Hester R Thou Harrison et al. Alternatives To Fauna Testing (Bug in Ecology Science and Technology) Imperial Society of Chemical science; 1 edition (June 7, 2006) ISBN 978-0-85404-211-ane
  2. ^ Lipinski, Christopher; Hopkins, A (xvi Dec 2004). "Navigating chemic space for biology and medicine". Nature. 432 (7019): 855–61. Bibcode:2004Natur.432..855L. doi:ten.1038/nature03193. PMID 15602551. S2CID 4416216.
  3. ^ Malcolm Rowland (February 2006). "Microdosing and the 3Rs". National Eye for the Replacement, Refinement, and Reduction of Animals in Inquiry ( NC3Rs ). Archived from the original on 28 September 2007. Retrieved 2007-09-22 .
  4. ^ "Alternatives?". Speaking of Enquiry. 2009-07-31. Retrieved 2014-02-26 .
  5. ^ FRAME (2005). "Human microdosing reduces the number of animals required for pre-clinical pharmaceutical inquiry". Alternatives to Laboratory Animals. 33 (439).
  6. ^ a b Russell, West.M.S. and Burch, R.L., (1959). The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique, Methuen, London. ISBN 0-900767-78-2 [1] Digital text available for gratuitous on the website of the Middle for Alternatives to Animal Testing.
  7. ^ "Special section: Monoclonal antibodies". Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Archived from the original on 2007-08-xx. Retrieved 2007-09-20 .
  8. ^ Brunner D.; Frank Jürgen; App Helmut; Schöffl Harald; Pfaller Walter; Gstraunthaler Gerhard (2010). "Serum-free Jail cell Civilisation: The Serum-free Media Interactive Online Database". Altex. 27 (ane): 53–62. doi:10.14573/altex.2010.1.53. PMID 20390239.
  9. ^ Doke, Sonali 1000.; Dhawale, Shashikant C. (July 2015). "Alternatives to brute testing: A review". Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal. 23, three: 223-229 (three): 223–229. doi:10.1016/j.jsps.2013.11.002. PMC4475840. PMID 26106269.
  10. ^ "EpiDermTM Tissue Model". MatTek Corporation. Retrieved 7 July 2015.
  11. ^ "L'Oréal cutaneous tissue technology platform". Invitroskin. 2007-04-30. Archived from the original on 2012-03-15. Retrieved 2014-02-26 .
  12. ^ "News - Congress - Workshops - SkinEthic Laboratories - SkinEthic Reconstructed Human Epidermis RHE validated in Europe". Skinethic.com. 2008-12-19. Retrieved 2014-02-26 .
  13. ^ "Alternatives In Testing". Neaves Humane Scientific discipline is Superior Scientific discipline. Archived from the original on eight July 2015. Retrieved 7 July 2015.
  14. ^ OECD (26 June 2020). Test No. 439: In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method (PDF). OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 4. OECD. doi:10.1787/9789264242845-en. ISBN9789264242845. S2CID 243117943. Retrieved 12 March 2021.
  15. ^ Stobbe JL, Drake KD, Maier KJ (2003). "Comparison of in vivo (Draize method) and in vitro (Corrositex assay) dermal corrosion values for selected industrial chemicals". International Journal of Toxicology. 22 (2): 99–107. CiteSeerX10.1.i.816.8092. doi:10.1080/10915810305094. PMID 12745991. S2CID 8901737. INIST:14763182.
  16. ^ Khan, Firdos Alam (September 20, 2011). Biotechnology Fundamentals. CRC Press. ISBN9781439820094 – via Google Books.
  17. ^ "Groundwork - 3T3 Neutral Red Uptake Phototoxicity Assay - MB Research Labs". 3t3nru.mbresearchlabs.com. Retrieved 24 April 2014.
  18. ^ "NIH3T3 General Information". NIH 3T3 Cell Line . Retrieved 12 March 2021.
  19. ^ Kristian Björnstad; Anders Helander; Peter Hultén; Olof Beck (2009). "Bioanalytical investigation of asarone in connection with Acorus calamus oil intoxications". Journal of Analytical Toxicology. 33 (9): 604–609. doi:10.1093/jat/33.9.604. PMID 20040135.
  20. ^ Joanna D. Moody; Donglu Zhang; Thomas G. Heinze; Carl Due east. Cerniglia (2000). "Transformation of amoxapine by Cunninghamella elegans". Applied and Ecology Microbiology. 66 (8): 3646–3649. Bibcode:2000ApEnM..66.3646M. doi:10.1128/AEM.66.8.3646-3649.2000. PMC92200. PMID 10919836.
  21. ^ A. Jaworski; 50. Sedlaczek; J. Dlugoński; Ewa Zajaczkowska (1985). "Inducible nature of the steroid 11-hydroxylases in spores of Cunninghamella elegans (Lendner)". Journal of Basic Microbiology. 25 (7): 423–427. doi:10.1002/jobm.3620250703. S2CID 85744435.
  22. ^ Hezari, M.; Davis, P. J. (1993). "Microbial models of mammalian metabolism. Furosemide glucoside formation using the mucus Cunninghamella elegans". Drug Metabolism and Disposition. 21 (two): 259–267. PMID 8097695.
  23. ^ Sharma, KK; Mehta, T; Joshi, Five; Mehta, N; Rathor, AK; Mediratta, KD; Sharma, PK (2011). "Substitute of animals in drug research: An approach towards fulfillment of 4R's". Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 73 (ane): 1–6. doi:10.4103/0250-474X.89750. PMC3224398. PMID 22131615.
  24. ^ Hogberg, Helena (June 4, 2020). "Mini-encephalon Organoids". Animal Welfare Information Center. Center for Alternatives to Beast Testing, Johns Hopkins Academy. Retrieved December 17, 2020.
  25. ^ Khan, Firdos Alam (September 20, 2011). Biotechnology Fundamentals. CRC Press. ISBN9781439820094 – via Google Books.
  26. ^ Schäfer-Korting Thou, Bock U, Diembeck W, Düsing HJ, Gamer A, Haltner-Ukomadu East, Hoffmann C, Kaca Yard, Kamp H, Kersen S, Kietzmann M, Korting HC, Krächter HU, Lehr CM, Liebsch M, Mehling A, Müller-Goymann C, Netzlaff F, Niedorf F, Rübbelke MK, Schäfer U, Schmidt East, Schreiber South, Spielmann H, Vuia A, Weimer Grand (2008). "The use of reconstructed human epidermis for skin absorption testing: Results of the validation study". Altern Lab Anim. 36 (2): 161–87. doi:x.1177/026119290803600207. PMID 18522484. S2CID 19259027.
  27. ^ Guthrie, Catharine (2008-03-27). "Putting Immunity in a Test Tube". Time. Archived from the original on March thirty, 2008. Retrieved 2009-12-22 .
  28. ^ "alternatives to animal testing". Peta. 2010-06-21.
  29. ^ "Asthma". entelos.com. Archived from the original on 2005-04-15. Retrieved 2007-ten-05 . (from Net Archive)
  30. ^ Bertocci GE, Pierce MC, Deemer Eastward, Aguel F, Janosky JE, Vogeley E (2003). "Using test dummy experiments to investigate pediatric injury risk in simulated brusque-distance falls". Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 157 (5): 480–6. doi:ten.1001/archpedi.157.5.480. PMID 12742885.
  31. ^ "I was a human crash-test dummy - Salon.com". Archive.salon.com. 1999-eleven-19. Archived from the original on 2014-02-26. Retrieved 2014-02-26 .
  32. ^ "Game of Hearts". Portfolio.com. 2008-07-xvi. Retrieved 2014-02-26 .
  33. ^ a b "Engineering science | Mouse brain simulated on computer". BBC News. 2007-04-27. Retrieved 2014-02-26 .
  34. ^ Wootton Robert C. R., Demello Andrew J. (2012). "Microfluidics: Analog-to-digital Drug Screening". Nature. 483 (7387): 43–44. Bibcode:2012Natur.483...43W. doi:x.1038/483043a. PMID 22382977. S2CID 205070310.
  35. ^ a b Rachid Jellali. "Liver and kidney cells cultures in a new perfluoropolyether biochip".
  36. ^ Prot Jean, Leclerc Eric (2012). "The Current Status of Alternatives to Beast Testing and Predictive Toxicology Methods Using Liver Microfluidic Biochips". Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 40 (6): 1228–243. doi:10.1007/s10439-011-0480-5. PMID 22160577. S2CID 6568516.
  37. ^ "Lung-on-a-fleck". Hansjorg Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering. Archived from the original on 2014-02-02. Retrieved 27 January 2014.
  38. ^ Commission on Toxicity Testing and Cess of Environmental Agents, National Research Council (2007). Toxicity testing in the 21st century: A vision and a strategy. doi:x.17226/11970. ISBN978-0-309-15173-three . Retrieved August 12, 2013.
  39. ^ "The Human Toxome Project". The Human Toxome Project. Archived from the original on 2014-02-02. Retrieved 27 January 2014.
  40. ^ "SEURAT-1 - Towards the Replacement of in vivo Repeated Dose Systemic Toxicity Testing". Seurat-1.eu. Retrieved 2014-02-26 .
  41. ^ "Sixth Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the Statistics on the number of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes in the fellow member states of the European Marriage COM(2010) 511/final 2" (PDF). European Commission. 2010. Retrieved August 20, 2013.
  42. ^ twenty Feb 2015. "Comparing the LAL Method with the Pyrogen Test on Rabbits". Wako Pyrostar. Retrieved 6 March 2015.
  43. ^ "Short Guidance On the Threshold Approach for Acute Fish Toxicity". Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Retrieved 27 January 2014.
  44. ^ "euroecotox.european union". euroecotox.eu. Retrieved 2014-01-27 .
  45. ^ "Habitation| AXLR8". Axlr8.eu. 2012-10-10. Retrieved 2014-01-27 .
  46. ^ The European Parliament and the Quango of the Eu (2010). "Directive 2010/63/Eu of the European Parliament and of the Council". Retrieved August 12, 2013.
  47. ^ "EUR-Lex - 31986L0609 - EN - EUR-Lex". Eur Lex. 11 Apr 2014. Retrieved 24 April 2014.
  48. ^ "Animals used for scientific purposes - Environment - European Commission". European Commission. 11 Apr 2014. Retrieved 24 Apr 2014.
  49. ^ a b "EURL ECVAM's" (PDF). Ihcp.jrc.ec.europa.eu. Retrieved 2014-02-26 .
  50. ^ "Eu-NETVAL (European Spousal relationship Network of Laboratories for the Validation of Culling Methods) — Institute for Health and Consumer Protection – (JRC-IHCP), European Commission". Ihcp.jrc.ec.europa.eu. 2014-01-20. Retrieved 2014-01-27 .
  51. ^ "Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council". Eur-lex.europa.eu. Retrieved 2014-02-26 .
  52. ^ European Parliament and the Quango of the European Spousal relationship (2006). "Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (Reach)". Retrieved August 11, 2013.
  53. ^ European Wedlock (31 May 2008). "Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory". Official Journal of the European Marriage. Retrieved 24 Apr 2014.
  54. ^ "Regulations: No 1331/2008". Eur-lex.europa.eu. Retrieved 2014-02-26 .
  55. ^ "Guidance for Submission for Nutrient Additive Evaluations". EFSA Journal. European Food Rubber Authority. 10 (7). sixteen Aug 2012. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2760.
  56. ^ "Domicile". Eusaat.org. Retrieved 2014-01-27 .
  57. ^ "World Congress flyer" (PDF). ALTEX. ALTEX.
  58. ^ "COLAMA 2012". Uff.br. Archived from the original on 2014-02-02. Retrieved 2014-01-27 .
  59. ^ "CAAT Workshops". Johns Hopkins Academy Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing . Retrieved December 8, 2020.
  60. ^ "Social Housing: Selected Presentations: Symposiums on Social Housing of Laboratory Animals". Animal Welfare Data Heart, National Agricultural Library . Retrieved December viii, 2020.
  61. ^ "7th Annual 3Rs Symposium: Practical Solutions and Success Stories". Animal Welfare Information Eye, National Agronomical Library . Retrieved December 8, 2020.
  62. ^ "Cosmetics Europe - Alternative Methods". Cosmeticseurope.european union. 2011-08-25. Retrieved 2014-02-26 .
  63. ^ "Developing alternative approaches to animal testing | Sustainable living | Unilever Global". Unilever.com. 2013-07-17. Archived from the original on 2014-02-01. Retrieved 2014-01-27 .
  64. ^ "Culling Methods in Use - BASF - The Chemical Company - Corporate Website". BASF. Archived from the original on 2013-08-19. Retrieved 2014-02-26 .
  65. ^ "Animal Testing | What Nosotros Do". Eurogroup For Animals. Archived from the original on 2014-03-25. Retrieved 2014-02-26 .
  66. ^ "Medical research on animals: facts and fiction". Vier-pfoten.org. 2012-eleven-13. Archived from the original on 2013-12-03. Retrieved 2014-01-27 .
  67. ^ "Antidote Europe". Antidote Europe. Archived from the original on 2014-02-07. Retrieved 2014-02-26 .
  68. ^ "Tierschutzbund". Tierschutzbund.de. Retrieved 2014-02-26 .
  69. ^ "LAV - Diritti agli animali - LAV". Lav.it. Retrieved 2014-02-26 .
  70. ^ "R&D on Alternative Methods to Creature Experimentation". AlexandraProject.org. Retrieved 24 Apr 2014.
  71. ^ "About United states of america". Buav.org. Archived from the original on 2014-02-08. Retrieved 2014-01-27 .
  72. ^ "NEAVS". Neavs.org. Archived from the original on 2014-02-23. Retrieved 2014-02-26 .
  73. ^ "Advancing Humane Science : Humane Club International". Hsi.org. Retrieved 2014-02-26 .
  74. ^ "Home". PETA.org.uk. 2012-01-10. Retrieved 2014-01-27 .
  75. ^ "stopvivisezione.net". stopvivisezione.net. Retrieved 2014-02-26 .
  76. ^ "Welcome". Go Cruelty Free. Archived from the original on 2007-06-06. Retrieved 2014-02-26 .
  77. ^ "Exist Cruelty-Free Entrada". Humane Society International . Retrieved 2019-x-xxx .
  78. ^ "Cease Fauna Testing : Humane Order International". Hsi.org. Retrieved 2014-02-26 .
  79. ^ "About the £250,000 Lush Prize". Lushprize.org. Retrieved 2014-02-26 .
  80. ^ "Enterprise and Industry - European Commission". Ec.europa.european union. 2011-01-01. Retrieved 2014-01-27 .
  81. ^ "Alternatives Enquiry Grants | Alternatives Research & Development Foundation (ARDF)". Ardf-online.org. Retrieved 2014-01-27 .
  82. ^ "3Rs Prize 2013". NC3Rs. 2013-12-xi. Retrieved 2014-01-27 .
  83. ^ a b "About United states | AFAAR". Alternativestoanimalresearch.org. Retrieved 2014-01-27 .
  84. ^ "IIVS". Iivs.org. Retrieved 2014-02-26 .
  85. ^ "NORINA database". norecopa.no.
  86. ^ "Norecopa". norecopa.no. Retrieved 2014-eleven-12 .
  87. ^ "Welcome". InterNICHE. Retrieved 2014-02-25 .
  88. ^ "Mission statement :: Tierschutz macht Schule". Tierschutzmachtschule.at. Archived from the original on 2013-12-03. Retrieved 2014-02-25 .
  89. ^ "Cell Culture Technology". XCellR8. Retrieved 2014-02-25 .
  90. ^ "AWIC Workshops & Trainings". Beast Welfare Information Center, National Agronomical Library . Retrieved December 8, 2020.
  91. ^ "MAWA Trust". MAWA Trust. Retrieved 2014-02-25 .
  92. ^ A Guide to the Alternatives of Beast Experimentation (2009; revised edition 2010). Eds. Syed Ziaur Rahman and Mohd Tariq Salman, Ibn Sina Academy of Medieval Medicine and Sciences, Aligarh, India (ISBN 978-81-906070-4-9)
  93. ^ Akbarsha, MA; Pereira, Shiranee (Nov–December 2010). "Mahatma Gandhi-Doerenkamp Center for Alternatives to Use of Animals in Life Science Instruction". Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapeutics. 1 (2): 108–ten. doi:ten.4103/0976-500X.72353. PMC3043344. PMID 21350619.
  94. ^ "JaCVAM". Jacvam.jp. Archived from the original on 2014-03-02. Retrieved 2014-02-26 .
  95. ^ "International Cooperation > KoCVAM". Nifds.go.kr. Archived from the original on 2014-04-13. Retrieved 2014-02-26 .
  96. ^ "BRA : Brazilian Heart for Validation of Alternative Methods established" (PDF). Altex.ch. Retrieved 2014-02-26 .
  97. ^ Presgrave OA (December 2008). "The need for the establishment of a Brazilian Eye for the Validation of Alternative Methods (BraCVAM)". Alternatives to Laboratory Animals. 36 (6): 705–viii. doi:10.1177/026119290803600613. PMID 19154096. S2CID 29946117. Archived from the original on 2014-03-05. Retrieved 2014-03-05 .
  98. ^ "Iii Rs". Ccac.ca. Archived from the original on 2013-12-xi. Retrieved 2014-02-26 .
  99. ^ "Framework for International Cooperation on Alternative Test Methods (ICATM) - Consumer and Personal Care Products - Wellness Canada". Hc-sc.gc.ca. Archived from the original on 2014-02-08. Retrieved 2014-02-25 .
  100. ^ "NTP Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods - National Toxicology Program". Iccvam.niehs.nih.gov. Archived from the original on 2013-12-09. Retrieved 2014-02-26 .
  101. ^ "Center for Alternatives to Creature Testing - Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health". Caat.jhsph.edu. Retrieved 2014-02-26 .
  102. ^ a b "European Marriage Reference Laboratory for alternatives to animal testing (EURL ECVAM) — Constitute for Wellness and Consumer Protection – (JRC-IHCP), European Commission". Ihcp.jrc.ec.europa.eu. 2014-01-24. Retrieved 2014-02-26 .
  103. ^ "Home page". Evcam Database Service on Culling methods to Creature Experimentation. Archived from the original on 2006-12-06. Retrieved 2018-10-13 .
  104. ^ "Review of REACH - Chemicals - Enterprise and Industry". Ec.europa.eu. 2013-06-28. Retrieved 2014-02-25 .
  105. ^ "European Partnership for Alternatives Approaches to Animal Testing - European Committee". Ec.europa.eu. 2014-02-20. Archived from the original on 2013-eleven-01. Retrieved 2014-02-26 .
  106. ^ "ecopa - european consensus-platform for alternatives". Ecopa.eu. Retrieved 2014-02-26 .
  107. ^ "Zentrum für Ersatz- und Ergänzungsmethoden zu Tierversuchen". zet. Archived from the original on 2014-03-02. Retrieved 2014-02-26 .
  108. ^ "FICAM front end page". Ficam.fi. 2012-09-26. Archived from the original on 2014-09-01. Retrieved 2014-06-02 .
  109. ^ "FRANCOPA: Accueil". Francopa.fr. Retrieved 2014-02-25 .
  110. ^ "ZEBET database on alternatives to animate being experiments on the Internet (AnimAlt-ZEBET)". BfR. 2004-09-30. Retrieved 2014-02-26 .
  111. ^ "Mission". BfR. Retrieved 2014-02-26 .
  112. ^ "Norwegian consensus platform for the replacement, reduction and refinement of animal experiments". Retrieved 2014-11-12 .
  113. ^ "Fund for the Replacement of Animals in Medical Experiments". Frame.org.britain. Retrieved 2014-02-26 .
  114. ^ "NC3RS". Nc3rs.org.great britain. Retrieved 2014-02-26 .
  115. ^ NIH. "Reducing the Number of Animals in Research Testing" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on June 27, 2013. Retrieved 24 April 2014.
  116. ^ "Official web site". ICH. Retrieved 2014-02-26 .
  117. ^ "Testing of chemicals". OECD. Retrieved 2014-02-26 .
  118. ^ "International Cooperation on Corrective Regulation (ICCR)". Fda.gov. Retrieved 2014-02-26 .
  119. ^ a b "Testing of chemicals". OECD. Retrieved 2014-02-25 .
  120. ^ "Members and partners". OECD. Retrieved 2014-02-25 .
  121. ^ "Welcome to ICAPO". Icapo.org. Retrieved 2014-02-25 .

External links [edit]

  • National Center for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research
  • Alternatives to Animals: The Latest: Tracks news stories almost scientific developments in alternatives to animal use
  • International Network for Humane Didactics
  • Johns Hopkins Academy Center for Alternatives to Beast Testing
  • Go3R: semantic search to avoid animal experiments
  • Alternatives Literature Searching, Animal Welfare Data Heart, National Agricultural Library. Provides tips on searching bibliographic databases for animal use alternatives. Besides has information on alternatives literature search training, including the workshop Coming together the Information Requirements of the Creature Welfare Act.
  • The Utilize of Databases, Information Centers and Guidelines When Planning Research that May Involve Animals, Animal Welfare Information Center Bulletin, National Agricultural Library. Provides an overview of databases, bibliographies and guidelines that provide useful information on alternative methods when planning research that may involve animals.
  • CADASTER 7th Framework Programme project aimed to develop computational methods to minimize number of experimental tests for REACH – Registration, Evaluation, Potency and Restriction of Chemicals

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternatives_to_animal_testing

Posted by: crosslond1967.blogspot.com

0 Response to "Animal Testing – Science Or Tradition? What Future For Alternatives To Animal Testing?"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel