How Many Animals Die Each Year From Animal Testing
What have humans gained from animal testing? Are we getting closer to finding a cure for HIV, cancer, and other diseases through animal experiments? These xi animal testing statistics will help you lot understand how animal experiments (don't) piece of work and what nosotros're (non) getting out of them.
1. Each twelvemonth, more than than 110 meg animals—including mice, frogs, dogs, rabbits, monkeys, fish, and birds—are killed in U.Due south. laboratories.
Experimenters force animals to inhale toxic fumes, immobilize them in restraint devices, drill holes into their skulls, mutilate their brains, and burn their skin and eyes—and if the animals don't die in the process, they're killed afterward. Whether information technology'due south for biology lessons, medical training, curiosity-driven experiments, or chemical, drug, food, or cosmetics testing, these animals are bars to barren cages, socially isolated, and psychologically traumatized.
Covance Cruelty
ii. 90-v per centum of all drugs that are shown to be condom and constructive in animal tests fail in man trials.
This stat comes straight from the National Institutes of Wellness (NIH)—the government agency that funnels billions of our taxpayer dollars into these reckless experiments. NIH has noted that the drugs neglect in humans considering they either don't piece of work or are dangerous. Because creature trials are and then unreliable, they brand human ones more risky.
3. Ninety-nine percent of the animals used in laboratories aren't covered past federal animal protection laws.
It's as if the authorities were saying, "I'm sorry, merely you're but non beast plenty" to the tens of millions of rats, mice, birds, fish, reptiles, and amphibians who constitute 99% of the animals used in laboratories withal are excluded by the federal Animate being Welfare Deed (AWA) and therefore denied even the most basic consideration. However, even animals who are supposedly "protected" under the AWA are still allowed to be burned, shocked, poisoned, isolated, starved, restrained, made addicted to drugs, and brain-damaged. No test—no matter how painful or piddling—is illegal. And hurting relief isn't required.
© Doctors Against Animal Experiments
4. Between 2015 and 2019, more than than 300,000 animals covered under the AWA were subjected to painful experiments without pain relief.
Rabbits haven't received whatever hurting relief in the Draize eye and pare irritation and corrosion tests since they started in the 1940s. In these tests, a substance is dripped into rabbits' eyes or smeared onto their shaved skin, leaving them to suffer from inflammation, ulcers, bleeding, irritated and cloudy optics, blindness, redness, swelling, belch, and hemorrhaging.
5. A 2009 survey found that mice and rats used in invasive, painful surgeries were only provided with postal service-operative hurting relief about 20% of the time.
The survey constitute that mice and rats who were subjected to skull surgeries, burn experiments, spinal surgeries, and other horrors rarely received post-procedural pain relief. Imagine someone drilling open your skull to expose your encephalon just not giving you and then much as an Advil.
half dozen. More 93% of experimental cancer drugs failed in the outset phase of human clinical trials after testing "successfully" on animals.
The survey was based on nearly 4,500 cancer drugs developed betwixt 2003 and 2011. Artificially inducing a status in a salubrious private of a dissimilar species who is confined and isolated in stressful, unnatural weather condition and then applying the results to naturally occurring diseases in humans is not only unethical merely likewise ridiculous. Even animal experimenters admit that the farthermost distress that these animals endure jeopardizes the results.
We've been handicapped by the fact that we have been studying diseases in animals that don't actually exist in animals. Mice … don't get schizophrenia. They don't get Alzheimer'due south disease.
—Dr. Christer Nordstedt, Eli Lilly's vice president of neuroscience research
7. The chemicals that cause cancer in rats only crusade information technology in mice 46% of the time.
If extrapolating from rats to mice is so unreliable, imagine the inefficiency of applying results from mice, rats, rabbits, dogs, and monkeys to humans. Richard Klausner, former caput of the National Cancer Plant, said, "The history of cancer research has been a history of curing cancer in the mouse. Nosotros accept cured mice of cancer for decades and it merely didn't work in humans."
8. One hundred HIV vaccines have been successful in fauna experiments—100% of them failed to protect humans sufficiently.
In i case, an HIV vaccine that was shown to be constructive in monkeys failed in human being clinical trials because it didn't prevent people from developing AIDS, and some believe that information technology made them more susceptible to it. According to a written report inThe Independent, one conclusion was that "testing HIV vaccines on monkeys before they are used on humans, does non in fact work."
Monkeys used for experiments are often housed inside tiny and near arid cages for their entire lives, deprived of everything that'south natural and important to them.
9. Every year in the U.Southward., NIH blows well-nigh 47% of enquiry funding on beast experimentation.
Approximately 47% of NIH-funded research involves animals, and in 2020, the agency budgeted almost $42 billion for research and development—that's $19.6 billion spent on animal experiments. Only for what? Do you know of whatever cures for multiple sclerosis, West Nile virus, or muscular dystrophy? Well, there aren't any. A 2014 review paper co-authored by a Yale School of Medicine professor in The BMJ documented the overwhelming failure of experiments on animals to amend homo wellness, concluding that "the public's continuing endorsement and funding of preclinical beast research seems misplaced."
10. Currently, 52% of U.S. adults oppose the use of animals in scientific research.
A Pew Research Center poll plant that the majority of American adults oppose the utilize of animals in scientific research, and other surveys suggest that the misguided folks who practice support it only feel that manner because they wrongly believe that it's necessary. In an commodity published in The Journal of the American Medical Association, researchers found that medical treatments developed for animals rarely translated to humans and warned that "patients and physicians should remain cautious about extrapolating the finding of prominent animal research to the care of homo illness … poor replication of fifty-fifty high-quality animal studies should be expected."
11. Since 2017, PETA has had virtually 150 victories for animals used in experiments.
Our victories include helping engineers develop a new ventilator for COVID-19 patients without animal testing, working with the Taiwan Food and Drug Administration to eliminate fauna tests for health marketing claims for foods, persuading Suave to go cruelty-free, and getting pharma behemothic Bristol Myers Squibb and others to ban near-drowning tests. PETA'southward work to end animal experiments—backed past the support of our more than half-dozen.5 million members and supporters worldwide—is saving countless animals.
*****
In NIH's most recent five-year plan, the bureau stated that "animal models often fail to provide expert ways to mimic disease or predict how drugs will piece of work in humans, resulting in much wasted time and money while patients look for therapies." Animal experiments are not a good indicator of drug responses in humans or whatever species other than the one being exploited. Penicillin is the courage of human antibiotics, yet it kills guinea pigs! Aspirin kills cats and causes birth defects in rats, mice, republic of guinea pigs, dogs, and monkeys, and morphine, a depressant in humans, stimulates goats, cats, and horses.
All these animal testing statistics tin be boiled down to just one: Animal experiments are speciesist—making them unacceptable 100% of the fourth dimension. They don't work, and fifty-fifty if they did, they'd still be unacceptable. Torturing sensitive beings isn't OK, fifty-fifty if someone'due south pretending it's for science or medicine—it'southward as simple every bit that.
Source: https://www.peta.org/features/animal-experimentation-statistics/#:~:text=1.,are%20killed%20in%20U.S.%20laboratories.
Posted by: crosslond1967.blogspot.com
0 Response to "How Many Animals Die Each Year From Animal Testing"
Post a Comment